Critiquing evidence based practice research Article

Critiquing evidence based practice research - Article ExampleThe research seeks to identify the verity of antithetical BP measurement devices in infirmaryised patients suffering from heart rhythm disorder. The problem of accuracy in the results from different measurement methods lacks significance since in general nursing practice BP measurement is performed using the machine-driven non-invasive devices for hospitalised patients. The manual non-invasive devices are commonly utilised in outpatient sections of the hospitals. While the quantitative approach of research remains remove for this kind of research, a better analysis would hand been making comparison between different automated BP measurement devices. This would be significant to the nursing profession as these are the devices utilised in entirely hospitals in acquiring the blood pressure of hospitalised patients(Pickering et al. 2005). The utilisation of automated devices within the hospital environment has been fav orite(a) because of patient comfort. Discomforts might cause patient movements, which result in blood pressure alteration.The research uncertainty has been stated explicitly within the context of the research. Explanations offered for development of the research questions and subsequent research variable place within the research be possessed of also been clearly stated. The materials utilised in reviewing the existing condition have significant relevance to the study, and clearly identify the problem as defined by the researchers. The available breeding regarding the problem being researched justifies the need to undertake further research on the identified problem. This would provide increase understanding of the factors contributing to occurrence of the problem stated. The conceptual framework and rationale behind the study have been appropriately identified within the research the identification of the variables and research problem has been based primarily on the utilised a cademic sources of reference for the research. Methods The study was undertaken in a community hospital with the approval of the hospitals investigational review board. The approval granted by this board signifies accreditation of the study, and subsequent satisfaction of the requirements stipulated by the formation in undertaking professional studies. Despite the approval from the investigational board, the patients rights might have been violated as they were not informed of any research being undertaken. The information provided to the researchers was provided in agreement with the institution and lacked approval or acceptance from the patients. The privacy agreement by the hospital not to divulge patients information became breached by providing enlarge of patients conditions, which the researchers utilised in making their sample selection. The study was not subjected to external reviewing except by the hospital board. While the study takes actions to prevent patient risk, it presents no